| 7
- RULES
Are rules culture-related?
There are differences between various
cultures in the ways they do things and in what they
regard as ‘normal behaviour’.
We probably all agree that it is a
good thing that there are traffic rules. Most of us
will agree that waiting for a red light - whether as
a pedestrian or a car driver - is not going to cost
us a lot of extra time. We probably agree that ‘zipping’ -
when two lanes of traffic merge - is quite an effective
way of working together on the road; letting someone
join your lane in front of you, and not only behind
you, is good for the flow of traffic. We probably also
agree that we should keep our cities and our countryside
clean, that car drivers should not empty their ashtrays
on the street or throw wrappers out of their window
("don't be a tosser"), that we should not
spit on the pavement, etc. And yet, we all break these
rules occasionally, especially when no one is looking,
when it is not going to cost us any money (a fine),
and when we expect that someone else is going to clean
up after us.
Is that perhaps at the root of our
behaviour? Are we all - all the people in Europe and
elsewhere - self-centred anarchists? Are we all ready
to break rules when nobody is looking, or when we are
not likely to get caught? If that is the case, then
the difference between cultures in this respect might
be just a question of a different approach to rule
breaking, with some people being more ready than others
to take risks.
The point is that if we had been born in a different
culture we would do exactly what the people in that
society do.
This is - or should be - a sobering
thought.
Do Task 13.

You are done
with this unit.
|